Understanding entrepreneurial academics ‐ how they perceive their environment differently

Todd Davey () and Victoria Galan-Muros
Additional contact information
Todd Davey: IMT-BS - MMS - Département Management, Marketing et Stratégie - TEM - Télécom Ecole de Management - IMT - Institut Mines-Télécom [Paris] - IMT-BS - Institut Mines-Télécom Business School - IMT - Institut Mines-Télécom [Paris], LITEM - Laboratoire en Innovation, Technologies, Economie et Management (EA 7363) - UEVE - Université d'Évry-Val-d'Essonne - Université Paris-Saclay - IMT-BS - Institut Mines-Télécom Business School - IMT - Institut Mines-Télécom [Paris], Innovative Futures Institute
Victoria Galan-Muros: Innovative Futures Institute

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: Purpose : Academic entrepreneurship is seen as a pathway for universities to create value from their knowledge. However, there has been a lack of clarity about what activities constitute academic entrepreneurship, the different type of entrepreneurial academics and how their perceptions of their environment relate to their engagement. Design/methodology/approach : Drawing on a large data set of 10,836 responses across 33 countries, the empirical study investigates European academics who undertake four academic entrepreneurship activities (spin-out creation, commercialisation of R&D results, joint R&D and consulting) to determine if they perceive the environment for academic entrepreneurship differently than those who undertake only some of the activities and those undertaking none at all. Findings : The findings show that less than 1% of academics undertake exclusively spin-offs creation or R&D commercialisation; however, the majority also engage in other entrepreneurial activities such as joint R&D and consulting and even other education and management engagement activities with industry. In addition, entrepreneurial academics in Europe perceive significantly higher motivators and more developed supporting mechanisms for academic entrepreneurship. However, their perceptions of barriers are similar. Practical implications : At a managerial and policy level, the study results call into question universities prioritising a narrow view of academic entrepreneurship which focusses only on spin-offs creation and R&D commercialisation. Instead, a broader view of academic entrepreneurship is recommended and appropriate mechanisms in place to enable academics to achieve research outcomes from their entrepreneurial activity. Originality/value : This paper offers an important contribution on how the perception of the environment contributes to the development of entrepreneurial behaviour in individual academics.

Keywords: University-industry; Knowledge transfer; Entrepreneurial academic; Academic entrepreneur; Entrepreneurial university; Spin-offs; Sustainable Development Goals (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020-11-18
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Published in Journal of Management Development, 2020, Special Issue: Micro Level Academic Entrepreneurship, 39 (5), pp.599-617. ⟨10.1108/JMD-09-2019-0392⟩

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03404342

DOI: 10.1108/JMD-09-2019-0392

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().