Comment la loi a instauré l’entreprise comme un acteur politique. Analyse historique et théorique de la loi Pacte et de la loi sur le devoir de vigilance

Armand Hatchuel (), Kevin Levillain () and Blanche Segrestin ()
Additional contact information
Armand Hatchuel: CGS i3 - Centre de Gestion Scientifique i3 - Mines Paris - PSL (École nationale supérieure des mines de Paris) - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres - I3 - Institut interdisciplinaire de l’innovation - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
Kevin Levillain: CGS i3 - Centre de Gestion Scientifique i3 - Mines Paris - PSL (École nationale supérieure des mines de Paris) - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres - I3 - Institut interdisciplinaire de l’innovation - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
Blanche Segrestin: CGS i3 - Centre de Gestion Scientifique i3 - Mines Paris - PSL (École nationale supérieure des mines de Paris) - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres - I3 - Institut interdisciplinaire de l’innovation - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: The literature extensively discusses the implications of the de facto political activities of contemporary corporations. Today's context, however, raises new fundamental questions about such activities. Is our political framework still valid when we consider the worldwide and creative power of business enterprises? Should this framework not allow, or even oblige, enterprises to address the great challenges we face today? Which framework would ensure that the power of corporations can be ‘well managed' or, in other words, directed towards the collective interest? This article shows that French law has introduced important legal innovations that offer original answers to these questions. It created the devoir de vigilance in 2017 that imposed a "duty of diligence" on firms. In 2019, with the Pacte law, France again imposed new obligations on all corporations and introduced the possibility for a firm to register as a "mission-led" corporation. We argue that these legal innovations established de jure the corporation as a political actor from both a theoretical and legal point of view. We also argue that these new laws build upon a new conceptualization of the enterprise. The enterprise is not only an economic and productive entity; it is also a power base for creative creation. Although these legal innovations are still too recent for their impact to be understood, we explain how they question the notion of the freedom of enterprise and classical political theory itself.

Date: 2021
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Published in Entreprises et Histoire, 2021, 104 (3), pp.184-197. ⟨10.3917/eh.104.0184⟩

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03411409

DOI: 10.3917/eh.104.0184

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().