EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

The apodictic method and the dialogue between theology and science (II)

Fr Petre Comșa and Costea Munteanu
Additional contact information
Fr Petre Comșa: UVT - Valahia University of Targoviste [Roumanie]
Costea Munteanu: A.S.E. - The Bucharest University of Economic Studies / Academia de Studii Economice din Bucureşti

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: Many present day scientists think that religion can never come to terms with science. In sharp contrast with this widespread opinion, the authors of this paper consider that, historically, scientific reasoning and religious belief joined hands in their effort to investigate and understand reality. In fact, the present-day divorce between science and religion is nothing else than the final outcome of a gradual, long-term, and deliberately assumed process of the secularization of science. However, especially during the last decades, we have all been equally confronted with the advance of a new concern that some contemporary scientists have, namely reviewing the sphere of problems specific to the domains of investigation in which they are involved while now facing themes that are usually addressed by theological thought. It can be said that this recent development is being captured by an emerging new field of investigation within the modern scientific epistemology, Science and Religion. Against this background, the purpose of this paper is threefold: firstly, to briefly emphasize that one of the defining dimensions of the science and religion dialogue is given by the discontinuity relationship in which the knowledge acquired through scientific reason is placed in relation to the divinely revealed one; secondly, to argue that another defining dimension of the dialogue consists in the hierarchical harmony relationship that mediates the encounter between the two, thus transgressing the discontinuity and making the theology-science dialogue possible and viable; and thirdly to advocate the idea that the apodictic method (based on antinomic logic) can successfully structure such a dialogue. The paper is divided into two parts: the first one addresses the problem of truth in theology and science with particular focus on the antinomic logic, while the second part aims to illustrate how the apodictic method (based on antinomic logic) effectively implements together-workingness between scientific analysis and theological teaching by applying it to the field of economic science, namely the theory of rational behavior, with reference to the issue of wealth and poverty.

Keywords: science and religion dialogue; discontinuity relationship; apodictic method; antinomic logic; patristic teaching; epistemological transfiguration (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022-11-24
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-hme
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-03426539v3
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Published in Journal of Philosophical Economics, inPress, Volume XV, ⟨10.46298/jpe.8740⟩

Downloads: (external link)
https://hal.science/hal-03426539v3/document (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03426539

DOI: 10.46298/jpe.8740

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-22
Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03426539