Moving towards a single contract ? Pros, cons, and mixed feelings
Nicolas Lepage-Saucier (),
Juliette Schleich and
Etienne Wasmer
Additional contact information
Nicolas Lepage-Saucier: Sciences Po - Sciences Po
Post-Print from HAL
Abstract:
Although the single employment contract is not popular among both representatives of workers and company leaders, the proposal for a single labor contract, created with the goal of reducing dualism, has paradoxically remained at the forefront of debates on the need for reform of the labor market. At first glance, the single employment contract seems to be an attractive response to the issue of dualism. However, upon looking more closely, it appears that a single contract would not resolve problems linked to precariousness and the consequences of employment protection. Most of the time, alternative policies could be more efficient. Moreover, while there are costs to dualism, these are not as obvious and well established as the ones triggered by employment protection itself. Finally, suppressing temporary contracts would lead, at a constant level of employment protection, to important employment losses, given that not all temporary jobs would become permanent jobs. A drastic reform of employment protection would be needed. Such a reform does not need to be linked to the creation of a new employment contract: counterparts in terms of unemployment insurance or firm sponsored training are possible.
Keywords: labor market; employment protection; dualism (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2013-04
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://sciencespo.hal.science/hal-03460872
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (17)
Published in LIEPP Policy Brief, 2013, 8
Downloads: (external link)
https://sciencespo.hal.science/hal-03460872/document (application/pdf)
Related works:
Working Paper: Moving towards a single contract ? Pros, cons, and mixed feelings (2013) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03460872
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().