EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Analyzing the Impact Level of SMEs Features Over Digital Transformation: A Case Study

Analyse du niveau d'impact des caractéristiques des PME sur la transformation numérique: Une étude de cas

Melissa Liborio Zapata, Lamia Berrah and Laurent Tabourot ()
Additional contact information
Melissa Liborio Zapata: SYMME - Laboratoire SYstèmes et Matériaux pour la MEcatronique - USMB [Université de Savoie] [Université de Chambéry] - Université Savoie Mont Blanc, LISTIC - Laboratoire d'Informatique, Systèmes, Traitement de l'Information et de la Connaissance - USMB [Université de Savoie] [Université de Chambéry] - Université Savoie Mont Blanc
Lamia Berrah: LISTIC - Laboratoire d'Informatique, Systèmes, Traitement de l'Information et de la Connaissance - USMB [Université de Savoie] [Université de Chambéry] - Université Savoie Mont Blanc
Laurent Tabourot: SYMME - Laboratoire SYstèmes et Matériaux pour la MEcatronique - USMB [Université de Savoie] [Université de Chambéry] - Université Savoie Mont Blanc

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: Digital Transformation (DT) represents a real challenge for companies worldwide, not only because of its complexity due to technology's fast evolution, but also because of the lack of appropriate guidance. Available approaches are judged generic as they do not take into account the specific context of companies. In this sense, this work explores the influence of context in DT success and introduces a performance indicator to measure the impact of the company features that represent its specific context on the dimensions involved in a DT. As the second phase in a research project aimed to build a quantitative model that explains this relationship, this paper focuses on the application of the Impact Level (IL) factor in a real case scenario. The goal is to validate a previous theoretical analysis and also to identify changes in the results with a different characterization of company features. Relevant findings confirm the critical importance of Culture (f3) and R&D investment (f9) for DT success, but many differences arise from the comparative analysis that reveals the DT process as highly contextual. Future work will be focused on translating the insights of both studies into a quantitative model that presents the IL as an aggregator but also with the possibility to provide enough detail for better decision-making during the DT process.

Date: 2021-09-05
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-03500160
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Published in IFIP International Conference on Advances in Production Management Systems (APMS), Sep 2021, Nantes, France. pp.40-48, ⟨10.1007/978-3-030-85902-2_5⟩

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03500160

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-85902-2_5

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03500160