EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Editorial

Jean-Louis Rastoin
Additional contact information
Jean-Louis Rastoin: Auteur indépendant

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: Foresight considers possible futures. For food systems 2 scenarios, displaying a now-common objective of carbon neutrality, are the subject of controversy. One, advocates chemical and biotechnological intensification, the other ecological intensification. To overcome the conflicting influences introducing knowledge and political recommendation biases, a structural, spatial and temporal contextualization is necessary. The 5th current food transition should favor the socio-ecological scenario.

Keywords: foresight; food system; stakeholder strategy; controversia; transition; prospective; système alimentaire; stratégie d’acteur; controverse (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-env and nep-his
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-03514312
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Published in Systèmes alimentaires / Food Systems, 2022, Systèmes alimentaires / Food Systems, 2021 (6), pp.17-24. ⟨10.48611/isbn.978-2-406-12705-5.p.0017⟩

Downloads: (external link)
https://hal.science/hal-03514312/document (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03514312

DOI: 10.48611/isbn.978-2-406-12705-5.p.0017

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03514312