Regional Nature Park, land of social innovation? When collective territorial intelligence reinvents living space: compared analysis of two cases France-Germany

Les Parcs Naturels Régionaux, terres d’Innovation sociale ? Quand le système d’intelligence collective territoriale réinvente l’espace de vie: analyse comparée de deux technostructures France-Allemagne

Delphine van Hoorebeke (), Helga Foure-Joopen () and Pierre Piré-Lechalard ()
Additional contact information
Delphine van Hoorebeke: CIRANO - Centre Interuniversitaire de Recherche en Analyse des Organisations, CERGAM de Toulon - Centre d'Études et de Recherche en Gestion d'Aix-Marseille/Equipe de recherche de Toulon - CERGAM - Centre d'Études et de Recherche en Gestion d'Aix-Marseille - AMU - Aix Marseille Université - UTLN - Université de Toulon - IAE Toulon - Institut d'Administration des Entreprises (IAE) - Toulon - UTLN - Université de Toulon
Helga Foure-Joopen: ISEOR - Institut de Socio-économie des Entreprises et des ORganisations - Institut de socio-économie des entreprises et des organisations
Pierre Piré-Lechalard: ESC Clermont-Ferrand - École Supérieure de Commerce (ESC) - Clermont-Ferrand

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: Abstract: One of the objectives of French regional nature parks (RNPs) is to experiment with new innovations and activities in their territory. It is these experiments that interest this article, in particular those dealing with social value. It investigates the collective intelligence system that emerges from the involvement of stakeholders during the development of this type of innovation. In other words, what form does the collective territorial intelligence take during the creation and development of social innovations? To do this, two structures are studied, one French, the other German. The comparison of these parks makes it possible to highlight the techno-structural and cultural differences in the development of social innovations. The results obtained show that although the French technostructure is, by virtue of their organisation, subject to injunctions, they particularly advocate inter-sectoral collaboration and form a solid support. In contrast, the German technostructure does not advocate innovation aims and appears to have a higher level of hierarchical distance. Despite these distinctions, the results indicate innovations in both cases studied but give an advantage to the French version. They confirm the role of the NRP as both initiator and coordinator (or both) of collective intelligence systems inducing social innovations.

Keywords: innovation sociale; intelligence collective; parc naturel régional; France; Allemagne (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Published in Politiques et Management public, 2021, Coopérations et innovations en développement local : un renouvellement des référentiels et des pratiques, 38 (spécial / 1), pp.97-121. ⟨10.3166/pmp.38.2021.0007⟩

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03549652

DOI: 10.3166/pmp.38.2021.0007

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().