Does City Structure Affect Job Search and Welfare?

Etienne Wasmer and Yves Zenou

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: We develop a model in which workers' search efficiency is negatively affected by access to jobs. Workers' location in a city is endogenous and reflects a trade-off between commuting costs and the surplus associated with search. Different configurations emerge in equilibrium; notably, the unemployed workers may reside far away (segregated city) or close to jobs (integrated city). We prove that there exists a unique and stable market equilibrium in which both land and labor markets are solved for simultaneously. We find that, despite inefficient search in the segregated city equilibrium, the welfare difference between the two equilibria is not so large due to differences in commuting costs. We also show how a social planner can manipulate wages by subsidizing/taxing the transport costs and can accordingly restore the efficiency.

Keywords: job matching; urban land use; transportation policies (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2002-05
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (124)

Published in Journal of Urban Economics, 2002, 51 (3), pp.515 - 541. ⟨10.1006/juec.2001.2256⟩

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
Journal Article: Does City Structure Affect Job Search and Welfare? (2002)
Working Paper: Does City Structure Affect Job Search and Welfare? (2002)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03588618

DOI: 10.1006/juec.2001.2256

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().