Institutionally Sustaining or Abandoning Mandatory Joint Audits: The Contrasting Cases of France and Denmark

Fatma Jemaa (), Kim Klarskov Jeppesen and Nadia M’hirsi
Additional contact information
Fatma Jemaa: CBS - Copenhagen Business School [Copenhagen]
Kim Klarskov Jeppesen: CBS - Copenhagen Business School [Copenhagen]
Nadia M’hirsi: CREGO - Centre de Recherche en Gestion des Organisations - Université de Haute-Alsace (UHA) - Université de Haute-Alsace (UHA) Mulhouse - Colmar - UB - Université de Bourgogne - UBFC - Université Bourgogne Franche-Comté [COMUE] - UFC - Université de Franche-Comté - UBFC - Université Bourgogne Franche-Comté [COMUE]

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: This study draws on two longitudinal case studies of the French and Danish joint audit models to understand and compare how mandatory joint audits have emerged and evolved. In both settings, joint audits appeared in the 1930s to increase auditors' competence and independence. After a few decades of practice, joint audits became taken for granted, but in the 1980s, conglomerated audit networks attempted to circumvent the joint audit rule, entering into conflict with local auditors. In France, the main association of auditors adopted successive regulatory measures that prevented circumventing the model, therefore avoiding its erosion. Such regulatory layering crucially reshaped the model to sustain belief in its potential whenever a particular form of joint audit failed. In Denmark, the local audit firms essentially resisted attacks against the model rhetorically, which was insufficient to prevent its erosion in the 1990s and its suppression by the law in 2005. Contrasting the two cases shows the multi-modal ways in which actors undertake institutional work and it provides timely information for regulators engaged in discussions about joint audits.

Keywords: Mandatory Joint Audit; Institutional Work; Regulatory Layering; Erosion (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Published in European Accounting Review, 2022, pp.1-28. ⟨10.1080/09638180.2022.2050775⟩

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03638982

DOI: 10.1080/09638180.2022.2050775

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().