Irresponsabilité et résipiscence

Batoul El Mawla, Assâad El Akremi and Jacques Igalens ()
Additional contact information
Batoul El Mawla: Unknown
Assâad El Akremi: Unknown
Jacques Igalens: Unknown

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: The objective of this paper is to show that claims of corporate social irresponsibility lead to two types of responses: individual resipiscence—individual firms making local "one-off" improvements or implementing broader improvements related to the particular area of controversy—and industry disciplining—compensatory actions by other firms in the industry that are not directly targeted by the claim. The authors test their theoretical predictions using hierarchical linear modeling and a sample of 1,803 firms from 2002 to 2014 from Thomson Reuters Responsibility Ratings.

Date: 2022-03
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Published in Revue Française de Gestion, 2022, vol. 48 (n° 303), pp.35-68. ⟨10.3166/rfg.303.35-68⟩

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03682079

DOI: 10.3166/rfg.303.35-68

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().