Assessing companies' decent work practices: An analysis of ESG rating methodologies

Céline Louche (), Guillaume Delautre and Gabriela Balvedi Pimentel

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: Environmental, social and governance (ESG) rating agencies, as non-financial data providers, have become central actors in the field of responsible investment. Although research has explored the construction of ESG metrics, little is known about how agencies evaluate decent work. Building on the analysis of six rating agencies, this article investigates how these actors measure and assess companies' performance in terms of decent work and related areas and identifies the challenges they face in this endeavour. The authors seek to better understand the capacity of responsible investment and ESG ratings to promote and improve decent work within companies.

Keywords: ESG rating agencies; Responsible investment; Decent work; Measurement; Corporate social responsibility (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022-06-07
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://audencia.hal.science/hal-03690210
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Published in International Labour Review, 2022, 162 (1), pp.69-97. ⟨10.1111/ilr.12370⟩

Downloads: (external link)
https://audencia.hal.science/hal-03690210/document (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Assessing companies' decent work practices: An analysis of ESG rating methodologies (2023)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03690210

DOI: 10.1111/ilr.12370

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().