Health care insurance payment policy when the provider and patient May Collude
Yaping Wu (),
David Bardey,
Yijuan Chen and
Sanxi Li
Additional contact information
Yaping Wu: TSE-R - Toulouse School of Economics - UT Capitole - Université Toulouse Capitole - UT - Université de Toulouse - EHESS - École des hautes études en sciences sociales - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement
Yijuan Chen: ANU - Australian National University
Sanxi Li: Renmin University of China = Université Renmin de Chine
Post-Print from HAL
Abstract:
This article explores a three‐party contracting problem when the patient and the provider possess private information that is unobservable to the insurer. We show that for an insurance mechanism to be collusion‐proof, it suffices for the insurer to rely on the incentive for one side of the patient‐provider coalition. If the risk premium for the patient is smaller than the provider's informational rent, placing the incentive on the patient generates a lower social cost than placing the incentive on the provider. We show that if the provider's effort is highly valued by the patient, the insurer should rely on the patient's incentive to implement a collusion‐proof second‐best insurance. Interestingly, an altruistic provider may lead to a higher social cost than a self‐interested provider. However, even if the insurer does not know the degree of provider altruism, it may still achieve the second‐best outcome by assuming that the provider is self‐interested. The model can be further extended to allow for different objective of the insurer, provider's informational advantage over patient, and auditing.
Keywords: Adverse selection; Health insurance; Payment scheme; Moral hazard; Patient; Provider coalition (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021-03
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)
Published in Health Economics, 2021, 30 (3), pp.525-543. ⟨10.1002/hec.4206⟩
There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03722547
DOI: 10.1002/hec.4206
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().