Meeting the research(er) and the researched halfway

Hugo Letiche (), Ivo de Loo (), Alan Lowe and David Yates
Additional contact information
Hugo Letiche: LITEM - Laboratoire en Innovation, Technologies, Economie et Management (EA 7363) - UEVE - Université d'Évry-Val-d'Essonne - Université Paris-Saclay - IMT-BS - Institut Mines-Télécom Business School - IMT - Institut Mines-Télécom [Paris], IMT-BS - DEFI - Département Droit, Économie et Finances - TEM - Télécom Ecole de Management - IMT - Institut Mines-Télécom [Paris] - IMT-BS - Institut Mines-Télécom Business School - IMT - Institut Mines-Télécom [Paris], Business University Nyenrode - Nyenrode Business Universiteit
Ivo de Loo: Business University Nyenrode - Nyenrode Business Universiteit
Alan Lowe: RMIT University - Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology University
David Yates: University of Sheffield [Sheffield]

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: How can we investigate something so indeterminate, unpredictable and enormous, as the current Covid-19 pandemic? We apply Karen Barad's relational ontology to illuminate some current dilemmas in research, where different forces, concepts and theories conflict with one another in multiple and complex ways. Barad's views, we argue, may help to address potential dilemmas of accountability, for instance of accounting research(ers) as they research the Covid-19 pandemic. In what Barad calls ‘intra-action', the research apparatus, the researched phenomena, and the research results, constitute a complex system of relatedness. In ‘intra-action' these elements never fully melt into one another, but rather, retain their ontological individuality. The research apparatus creates ‘real' effects, but these can only be partially observed and disentangled. Which elements intra-act as the research progresses is the product of so-called ‘agential cuts'. We have researched the Covid-19 pandemic via what Barad would call a (small-scale) ‘experiment'. We have focused on air travel and more specifically on American Airlines: a hyperobject or social-economic object so complex and powerful that it cannot be captured in any single definition or analysis. Among others, we take guidance from Albert Camus' The Plague in our analysis, concluding that AA (as a hyperobject) cannot really meet the research(ers) halfway, as Barad would call for. This is because the mutuality of ‘intra-action', that is demanded is foreclosed. Consequently, while we believe that Barad's views hold great merit for accounting research in the current crisis, we suggest that they raise deeply troubling dilemmas as well.

Keywords: Accountability; Agential cuts; Agential realism; American Airlines; Diffraction; Intra-action (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023-08
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Published in Critical Perspectives On Accounting, 2023, 94, pp.102452. ⟨10.1016/j.cpa.2022.102452⟩

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03746987

DOI: 10.1016/j.cpa.2022.102452

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().