Women in leadership positions in universities: are they really queen bees?

Rebeca da Rocha Grangeiro (), Manoel Bastos Gomes Neto and Catherine Esnard ()
Additional contact information
Rebeca da Rocha Grangeiro: UFCA - Universidade Federal do Cariri [Brasil] = Federal University of Cariri [Brazil] = Université fédérale du Cariri [Brésil]
Manoel Bastos Gomes Neto: UFCA - Universidade Federal do Cariri [Brasil] = Federal University of Cariri [Brazil] = Université fédérale du Cariri [Brésil]
Catherine Esnard: CeRCA [Poitiers, Tours] - Centre de recherches sur la cognition et l'apprentissage [UMR 7295] - UP - Université de Poitiers = University of Poitiers - UT - Université de Tours - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to assess the adherence to the traits of the queen bee phenomenon (QBP) for women who hold leadership positions in Brazilian higher education institutions (HEIs) and to compare their responses with those of women without leadership positions and of men on the same dimensions. Design/methodology/approach: A total of 703 academics from 88 HEIs participated in this study. The data were analyzed using a statistical package to calculate descriptive and inferential statistics. For these, 2 × 2 analysis of variance tests were performed to compare leader women vs nonleader women and leader women vs leader men. Findings: The results indicate that leader women do not fit to all dimensions of the QBP. They report high averages to commitment, agency traits and personal sacrifices to career (Male self-description) and to meritocratic discourse. However, leader women assess their junior counterparts with higher averages to commitment and agency traits than women without leadership positions and leader men assess their junior counterparts. Women in leadership positions report superior identification with same gender colleagues and declare to be more supportive with affirmative policies for women's professional development than nonleader women and leader men. Practical implications: This study reinforces that same gender conflict in the work environment is not a female characteristic and also promotes reflections on the influence of organizational culture, men hostility toward quotas and gender stereotypes for female progression in the academic context. Originality/value: This study provides an empirical analysis of the QBP to academic women in Brazilian HEIs and compares its dimensions to nonleader women and leader men. The analysis of a sexist culture enabled original results, as nondistancing of the self-group, even if leader women presented some QB traits.

Keywords: Gender; Higher Education Institutions; Queen Bee Phenomenon; Leadership; Academic career; Female career (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-hme
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-03758851v1
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Published in Management Research Review, 2022, ⟨10.1108/MRR-03-2021-0239⟩

Downloads: (external link)
https://hal.science/hal-03758851v1/document (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03758851

DOI: 10.1108/MRR-03-2021-0239

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().