Designing Local Public Organizations for the Introduction of an Institutional Logic of Co-creation

Magdalena Potz (), Sarah Serval, Anais Saint Jonsson and Bruno Tiberghien ()
Additional contact information
Magdalena Potz: AMU - Aix Marseille Université, CERGAM - Centre d'Études et de Recherche en Gestion d'Aix-Marseille - AMU - Aix Marseille Université - UTLN - Université de Toulon, AMU IMPGT - Institut de management public et de gouvernance territoriale - AMU - Aix Marseille Université
Sarah Serval: AMU - Aix Marseille Université, CERGAM - Centre d'Études et de Recherche en Gestion d'Aix-Marseille - AMU - Aix Marseille Université - UTLN - Université de Toulon, AMU IMPGT - Institut de management public et de gouvernance territoriale - AMU - Aix Marseille Université
Anais Saint Jonsson: AMU - Aix Marseille Université, CERGAM - Centre d'Études et de Recherche en Gestion d'Aix-Marseille - AMU - Aix Marseille Université - UTLN - Université de Toulon, AMU IMPGT - Institut de management public et de gouvernance territoriale - AMU - Aix Marseille Université
Bruno Tiberghien: AMU - Aix Marseille Université, CERGAM - Centre d'Études et de Recherche en Gestion d'Aix-Marseille - AMU - Aix Marseille Université - UTLN - Université de Toulon, AMU IMPGT - Institut de management public et de gouvernance territoriale - AMU - Aix Marseille Université

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: This paper provides new insights to introduce a conflicting institutional logic with an anticipatory approach. The aim is to identify the most suitable strategy and the organizational design in order to best prepare the introduction of a new institutional logic with as little conflicts as possible. To do so, we led an experiment research method hand in hand with public managers in order to identify potential sources of conflict, levers that can be used, and changes to conduct. We studied a specific organisational field marked by institutional complexity: a local public organization with a heavily bureaucratic functioning, and the introduction of an institutional logic of co-creation (ILCC) to build local public policies. Findings shed light on sources of conflict situated on multiple levels: the micro-level of individuals, the organization's position in the field, as well as the nature of the institutional logics themselves. Finally, the most suitable strategy is based on the design of a progressive, stratification-like introduction process for an ILCC to prevent conflicts with existing institutional logics.

Date: 2022
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-03792084v1
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Published in Academy of Management Proceedings, 2022, 2022, ⟨10.5465/ambpp.2022.15965abstract⟩

Downloads: (external link)
https://hal.science/hal-03792084v1/document (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03792084

DOI: 10.5465/ambpp.2022.15965abstract

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().