Political Economy and Utilitarianism in Dickens’ Hard Times
Nathalie Sigot () and
Çinla Akdere
Additional contact information
Nathalie Sigot: PHARE - Philosophie, Histoire et Analyse des Représentations Économiques - UP1 - Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne
Post-Print from HAL
Abstract:
The paper will re-examine Charles Dickens' understanding of utilitarianism through a study of Hard Times. In agreement with what the current literature that focuses on the joint criticism that Dickens and Bentham made of the administration of the time, or on the biased presentation made by the former of the philosophy of the latter, which leads to criticism that emphasis is placed on pain alone, while the principle of utility emphasizes pleasure as well (Blake 2009), we will demonstrate the need to nuance Dickens' position as regards utilitarianism, a philosophy which he knew well (see Goldberg 1972; Stone 1985). To do so we need to distinguish what, in this work, pertains to his criticism against political economy and what pertains to his criticism against utilitarianism (I). We will illustrate our arguments by pointing out the dynamics at work throughout the novel and we will prove that for Dickens, utilitarianism was open to change, while the effects of the economy remain inalterable and admit no solutions (II).
Date: 2017-10
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Published in Ҫınla Akdere, Christine Baron. Economics and Literature. A Comparative and Interdisciplinary Approach, Routledge, 13 p., 2017, 9780367886202. ⟨10.4324/9781315231617⟩
There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03825534
DOI: 10.4324/9781315231617
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().