Experimental Evidence on Affirmative Action

Véronique Gille (gille@dial.prd.fr)

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: Although beliefs about the effect of affirmative action are widespread, behavioral responses to affirmative actions (from beneficiaries and non-beneficiaries) cannot easily be understood without experimental evidence. In this chapter I review the findings from the experimental literature on two key questions: can affirmative action increase representation without harming efficiency? Are affirmative action beneficiaries penalized by others? The findings highlight that beneficiaries respond to affirmative action as it changes their probability of participating in competitions and it changes their effort level. But the efficiency cost of affirmative action to the society, if any, is small, as affirmative action enhances the participation of highly performing individuals, who would have not participated otherwise. Moreover, beneficiaries do not suffer from backlash from non-beneficiaries. The negative societal impact of affirmative action is therefore likely to be limited.

Keywords: Affirmative action; Experiment; Behavior; Participation; Efficiency loss (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Published in Handbook on Economics of Discrimination and Affirmative Action, pp.10, 2022, ⟨10.1007/978-981-33-4016-9_37-1⟩

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
Working Paper: Experimental Evidence on Affirmative Action (2022)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03850041

DOI: 10.1007/978-981-33-4016-9_37-1

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD (hal@ccsd.cnrs.fr).