Is U.S. Grand Strategy Dead? The Political Foundations of Deep Engagement After Donald Trump

Jeffrey A. Friedman
Additional contact information
Jeffrey A. Friedman: IAST - Institute for Advanced Study in Toulouse

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: International Relations scholars frequently warn that the American political system has become too fractured to sustain a coherent grand strategy. This perception generally rests on two premises: that President Donald Trump led an unprecedented assault on established principles of US foreign policy, and that Democrats and Republicans have become so polarized that they can no longer agree on a common vision for global leadership. By contrast, this article argues that the grand strategy of deep engagement retains robust bipartisan support. Even though President Trump rejected more expansive conceptions of liberal internationalism, his behaviour was largely consistent with deep engagement's principles. Moreover, when Trump departed from deep engagement—as with questioning the US commitment to NATO—his actions did not reflect voters' policy preferences. In fact, polling data indicate that public support for deep engagement is at least as strong today as it has been at any other point since the end of the Cold War. Altogether, the article thus demonstrates that the grand strategy of deep engagement is less embattled, and more politically viable, than the conventional wisdom suggests.

Keywords: Conflict; Security; Defence (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022-07-05
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Published in International Affairs, 2022, vol.98 (n°4), pp.1289-1305. ⟨10.1093/ia/iiac112⟩

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03909278

DOI: 10.1093/ia/iiac112

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().