Happiness and Public Spending

François Facchini

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: This article presents the traditional limitations of happiness economics and the uncertainty about the econometric relationship between public spending and happiness. It also argues that the happiness metric is a new form of social engineering, and that as such, happiness economics is biased toward a particular political utopia and scientific ideal. The political utopia is liberticidal, antidemocratic. It transforms democracy into "pollo-cracy"—i.e., the government (kratos) to the pollsters. The scientific ideal is positivist and favors government by numbers. This scientific norm underestimates the limits of statistical work. The social engineering of happiness is a new fatal presumption of policy makers. It is a new way to critique the free market economy and to substitute profit with a social criterion of quality of life and happiness.

Keywords: Public spending; Happiness; Statistic; Social ingineering; Dépenses publiques; Bonheur; statocratie; ingénieur social (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-03911710
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Published in Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics, 2022, 25 (2), pp.147-174. ⟨10.35297/qjae.010132⟩

Downloads: (external link)
https://hal.science/hal-03911710/document (application/pdf)

Related works:
Working Paper: Happiness and Public Spending (2022)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03911710

DOI: 10.35297/qjae.010132

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().