Market power and risk of Central and Eastern European banks: Does more powerful mean safer?
Ion Lapteacru
Additional contact information
Ion Lapteacru: Larefi - Laboratoire d'analyse et de recherche en économie et finance internationales - UB - Université de Bordeaux, ILD - Institut Léon Duguit - UB - Université de Bordeaux
Post-Print from HAL
Abstract:
As understanding the market power–risk relationship in CEE banking systems is of the utmost importance to policy-makers in these countries, we investigate whether CEE banks must have greater market power to be safer. Our results suggest that more market power reduces the fragility of banking institutions, on one hand, and that banking market concentration tends to make these banks riskier, on the other. Our findings are robust to whatever form of market power-risk relationship and whatever market-power measures we use. More precisely, financial markets perceive CEE banks with more market power as less fragile, while the latter are also better capitalised with respect to the distribution of their returns. Moreover, they are even (much) better capitalised when they hold less-diversified and less-liquid assets and when they operate within a stricter banking regulatory environment, which suggests a risk-stabilising role for diversification, liquidity and the bank regulatory environment in these countries.
Date: 2017-06-01
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)
Published in Economic Modelling, 2017, 63, pp.46-59. ⟨10.1016/j.econmod.2017.01.022⟩
There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03943844
DOI: 10.1016/j.econmod.2017.01.022
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().