Supernatural punishment beliefs as cognitively compelling tools of social control

Léo Fitouchi and Manvir Singh ()
Additional contact information
Léo Fitouchi: Unknown
Manvir Singh: IAST - Institute for Advanced Study in Toulouse

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: Why do humans develop beliefs in supernatural entities that punish uncooperative behaviors? Leading hypotheses maintain that these beliefs are widespread because they facilitate cooperation, allowing their groups to outcompete others in intergroup competition. Focusing on within-group interactions, we present a model in which people strategically endorse supernatural punishment beliefs as intuitive tools of social control to manipulate others into cooperating. Others accept these beliefs, meanwhile, because they are made compelling by various cognitive biases: they appear to provide information about why misfortune occurs; they appeal to intuitions about immanent justice; they contain threatening information; and they allow believers to signal their trustworthiness. Explaining supernatural beliefs requires considering both motivations to invest in their endorsement and the reasons others adopt them.

Date: 2022-04
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Published in Current Opinion in Psychology, 2022, vol. 44, pp.252-257. ⟨10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.09.022⟩

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04039349

DOI: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.09.022

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().