EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

A cost-benefit analysis of decarbonizing long-haul rail freight with hydrogen

Analyse coûts-bénéfices de la décarbonation du fret ferroviaire longue distance par l'hydrogène

Antoine Belleguie ()
Additional contact information
Antoine Belleguie: Université Gustave Eiffel, AME-SPLOTT - Systèmes Productifs, Logistique, Organisation des Transports et Travail - Université Gustave Eiffel, Research and Development Department - Alstom Transport - Research and Development Department - Alstom Transport - Alstom Transport - Alstom Transport

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: At the time of a global energy transition, rail has emerged as one of the cornerstones of green mobility but it is still responsible for the emission of Greenhouse Gases (GHG) and air pollutants. Today, given that 56% of all track-kilometers are non-electrified, 57% of the locomotives are diesel-powered and over 75% of them are used for freight (UNIFE, 2022). Even if electrification is progressing worldwide, there are still, for economic, technical and safety reasons, portions that are not electrified. As a result, today, 80% of diesel freight train-kilometers in France are done under catenaries (Simian and al., 2018). An environmental nonsense that leads to avoidable emissions. Although the literature on transportation costs is abundant (Anupriya, 2020), the sub-theme of rail, and more specifically of decarbonized rail alternatives, is still understudied. This research aims to demonstrate the interest of hydrogen for long distance rail freight through a Cost- Benefit Analysis (CBA) on real use cases. We propose an innovative method to (1) calculate the Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) in Net Present Value (NPV) over the lifetime of the Rolling Stock (RS) including evolution scenarios; (2) establish an evaluation of the emissions balance. The uniqueness of our approach lies in the fact that we compare the polluting solution and the decarbonized hydrogen alternative via the economic equation and the environmental balance, often treated separately even though the two are interdependent. We believe that this approach, applied in this case to a hydrogen solution, will allow for an effective comparison of carbon-free rail alternatives for a given mission and provide concrete answers to decision-makers within the framework of public policies. This economic approach, while initially intended for rail, could be applied to other modes of transportation.

Keywords: Cost-benefit analysis; Decarbonization; Hydrogen; Rail freight; Analyse coût bénéfice; Décarbonation; Hydrogène; Fret ferroviaire (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023-03-09
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Published in Society for Benefit-Cost Analysis – Annual Conference (SBCA 2023), Society for Benefit-Cost Analysis (SBCA), Mar 2023, Washington, D. C., United States

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04077219

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().

 
Page updated 2026-05-26
Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04077219