Testing Random Assignment To Peer Groups

Koen Jochmans

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: Identification of peer effects is complicated by the fact that the individuals under study may self-select their peers. Random assignment to peer groups has proven useful to sidestep such a concern. In the absence of a formal randomization mechanism it needs to be argued that assignment is `as good as' random. This paper introduces a simple yet powerful test to do so. We provide theoretical results for this test. As a by-product we equally obtain such results for an approach popularized by Guryan, Kroft and Notowidigdo (2009). These results help to explain why this approach suffers from low power, as has been observed elsewhere. Our approach can equally be used to test for the presence of peer effects in the linear-in-means model without modification.

Keywords: Asymptotic power; Bias; Fixed effects; Peer effects; Random assignment; Test (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-des and nep-ure
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-04077423v1
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (7)

Published in Journal of Applied Econometrics, 2023, 38 (3), pp.321-333. ⟨10.1002/jae.2953⟩

Downloads: (external link)
https://hal.science/hal-04077423v1/document (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Testing random assignment to peer groups (2023)
Working Paper: Testing Random Assignment To Peer Groups (2021)
Working Paper: Testing Random Assignment to Peer Groups (2020)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04077423

DOI: 10.1002/jae.2953

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().