Favoriser l’innovation par le lean product development: le comportement humain, un indicateur pertinent ?

Maéva Jaffré, Eric Blanco (), Pierre Chévrier () and Bernard Penz ()
Additional contact information
Maéva Jaffré: G-SCOP_CCI - Conception Collaborative et Intégrée - G-SCOP - Laboratoire des sciences pour la conception, l'optimisation et la production - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - UGA - Université Grenoble Alpes - Grenoble INP - Institut polytechnique de Grenoble - Grenoble Institute of Technology - UGA - Université Grenoble Alpes
Eric Blanco: CReA - Centre de Recherche de l'École de l'air - Armée de l'air et de l'espace
Pierre Chévrier: G-SCOP_CCI - Conception Collaborative et Intégrée - G-SCOP - Laboratoire des sciences pour la conception, l'optimisation et la production - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - UGA - Université Grenoble Alpes - Grenoble INP - Institut polytechnique de Grenoble - Grenoble Institute of Technology - UGA - Université Grenoble Alpes
Bernard Penz: G-SCOP - Laboratoire des sciences pour la conception, l'optimisation et la production - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - UGA - Université Grenoble Alpes - Grenoble INP - Institut polytechnique de Grenoble - Grenoble Institute of Technology - UGA - Université Grenoble Alpes, G-SCOP_GROG - Groupe Recherche Opérationnelle de Grenoble - G-SCOP - Laboratoire des sciences pour la conception, l'optimisation et la production - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - UGA - Université Grenoble Alpes - Grenoble INP - Institut polytechnique de Grenoble - Grenoble Institute of Technology - UGA - Université Grenoble Alpes

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: The links between lean product development (LPD) and performance, particularly innovation, vary depending on the company. This raises the question of the parameters influencing the results of the LPD. The issue of LPD and innovation is often analyzed from a "tool" point of view. The actors and their own logics are topics not covered. In this study we ask the question of the importance of human behavior in the success of the LPD to promote innovation. We also wonder how to measure this parameter. To answer this question, we carried out a field study in a technological R&D of semiconductors and did a triangulation of the data collected there. This study allowed us to observe that factually some levers of lean related to innovation were less implemented than others. However, when we examine the field, the human dimension systematically emerges as a factor fostering innovation. This showed us the importance and predominance of human behavior in innovation in this company. Subsequently, we propose a first way of classifying the qualities of behavior conducive to innovation. From this qualification comes a proposal for behavioral indicators, KBIs.

Keywords: KBI; Innovation; Lean Product Development; Indicators; Field study; Indicateurs; Etude de terrain (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023-06-14
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-ppm and nep-sbm
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-04165613v1
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Published in CIGI QUALITA MOSIM 2023, Jun 2023, Trois Rivieres, Canada

Downloads: (external link)
https://hal.science/hal-04165613v1/document (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04165613

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().