Ethics and research methodology in the studying of corporate governance

Ivo de Loo () and Hugo Letiche ()
Additional contact information
Ivo de Loo: Business University Nyenrode - Nyenrode Business Universiteit
Hugo Letiche: LITEM - Laboratoire en Innovation, Technologies, Economie et Management (EA 7363) - UEVE - Université d'Évry-Val-d'Essonne - Université Paris-Saclay - IMT-BS - Institut Mines-Télécom Business School - IMT - Institut Mines-Télécom [Paris], IMT-BS - DEFI - Département Droit, Économie et Finances - TEM - Télécom Ecole de Management - IMT - Institut Mines-Télécom [Paris] - IMT-BS - Institut Mines-Télécom Business School - IMT - Institut Mines-Télécom [Paris], Business University Nyenrode - Nyenrode Business Universiteit

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: Research methodology can be seen as a manifestation of applied ethics, grounded in assumptions about the appropriateness, fairness, and integrity of relatedness, particularly between the researcher and the researched. Likewise, corporate governance poses ethical questions: how can one account for the fairness and integrity of the governance of corporates and their behavior? Who or what determines what is "fair" and/or "good" (in) governance? In our contribution we examine how these two levels of ethics interact, asking how mixed methods research can help to evaluate the ensuing interactions. If we follow Emmanuel Levinas' ethics, the researcher's encounter with the researched (which may be called the "Other") forms the basis of just and fair relatedness: both in research and in governance. But Levinas did not extrapolate his ethics to corporate institutions or research methodology, which we are setting out to do here. To extend Levinas' ethics of "Otherness," we follow the logic of "flat ontology," derived from Bruno Latour and Graham Harman. To explore the robustness of our position, we present a (mini)case of FairPrice, examining when and how research methodology is ethically grounded and assessments of the fairness of corporate governance can viably be made. We conclude that mixing research methods can do very little to bring ethically grounded research based on a flat ontology into reach. However, there is a way to appropriate such ethically grounded research, which we will set out in this contribution. Both types of consideration need to be taken into account when conducting corporate governance research.

Date: 2023-04-21
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Published in Nicola Cucari; Sibel Yamak; Salvatore Esposito De Falco; Bill Lee. Handbook of Research Methods for Corporate Governance, Edward Elgar Publishing, pp.39-55, 2023, Handbooks of Research Methods in Management series, 978-1-80220-288-5. ⟨10.4337/9781802202892.00009⟩

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04179630

DOI: 10.4337/9781802202892.00009

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().