When smart meters backfire on energy transition internalization: Ethical electricity suppliers' mitigation of consumer data vulnerability and attendant psychological disempowerment

Françoise Simon () and Virginie Schweitzer ()
Additional contact information
Françoise Simon: CREGO - Centre de Recherche en Gestion des Organisations - Université de Haute-Alsace (UHA) - Université de Haute-Alsace (UHA) Mulhouse - Colmar - UB - Université de Bourgogne - UBFC - Université Bourgogne Franche-Comté [COMUE] - UFC - Université de Franche-Comté - UBFC - Université Bourgogne Franche-Comté [COMUE]
Virginie Schweitzer: CREGO - Centre de Recherche en Gestion des Organisations - Université de Haute-Alsace (UHA) - Université de Haute-Alsace (UHA) Mulhouse - Colmar - UB - Université de Bourgogne - UBFC - Université Bourgogne Franche-Comté [COMUE] - UFC - Université de Franche-Comté - UBFC - Université Bourgogne Franche-Comté [COMUE]

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: Policymakers and electricity suppliers are pursuing systematic strategies to install smart meters, replacing traditional meters in households, to improve the functioning of the smart grid and help consumers save energy by accessing detailed, real-time feedback on their energy consumption. Drawing on Self-Determination Theory, this paper develops a model of the process of consumer disempowerment associated with smart meter-induced data vulnerability. This process ultimately leads to the erosion of consumers' internalization of energy transition goals through the mediation of their perceived competency in using the device. Several aspects of electricity supplier behavior that could reduce the negative effects of smart meter-induced data vulnerability are explored, including managing data transparency in a relational way, ensuring fairness in the exchange with the customer, and avoiding pricing personalization based on the customer's private data. A quantitative survey conducted in France validated this model. Overall, this study contributes to the literature on customer data vulnerability and enriches the understanding of smart meter acceptability by identifying potential drawbacks of feedback-based smart devices for sustainable consumption. It also outlines how companies should engage in ethical practices when deploying smart technologies.

Keywords: Data vulnerability; Disempowerment; Goal internalization; Algorithmic pricing; Data transparency; Energy transition (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023-09
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Published in Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2023, 194, ⟨10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122738⟩

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04185026

DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122738

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().