EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Conservation auctions: an online double constraint reverse auction experiment

Adrien Coiffard (), Raphaële Préget () and Mabel Tidball ()
Additional contact information
Adrien Coiffard: CEE-M - Centre d'Economie de l'Environnement - Montpellier - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement - Institut Agro Montpellier - Institut Agro - Institut national d'enseignement supérieur pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement - UM - Université de Montpellier
Raphaële Préget: CEE-M - Centre d'Economie de l'Environnement - Montpellier - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement - Institut Agro Montpellier - Institut Agro - Institut national d'enseignement supérieur pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement - UM - Université de Montpellier
Mabel Tidball: CEE-M - Centre d'Economie de l'Environnement - Montpellier - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement - Institut Agro Montpellier - Institut Agro - Institut national d'enseignement supérieur pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement - UM - Université de Montpellier

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: Conservation auctions are reverse auctions designed to allocate payments for environmental services. We perform an online experiment to study a reverse auction that combines both a budget and a target constraint, i.e., a double constraint auction. We compare the performance of this auction format to target and budget constraint formats according to three different criteria: the number of units purchased, the budget spent and the unit cost. Our results show that the performance of the double constraint auction, compared with announcing only a target constraint or a budget constraint, depends on the buyer's objective(s). Indeed, our main conclusion is that no ranking satisfies our three criteria simultaneously.

Keywords: Reverse auctions; Conservation auctions; Double constraint (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023-09-07
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Published in 10th FAERE annual conference, Sep 2023, Montpellier, France. 29 p

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04217153

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04217153