Strengths, weaknesses and paradoxes of Walras' monetary theory
Forces, faiblesses et paradoxes de la théorie monétaire de Walras
Nicolas Piluso ()
Post-Print from HAL
Abstract:
The aim of this article is to study Walrasian money theory in the light of Cartelier's general criticism of standard theory, which justifies his direct monetary approach to the economy. We argue that Walras succeeded well before his successors in integrating money into the theory of value, avoiding many of the pitfalls into which many contemporary monetary theories fall. This work will highlight a paradoxical result: despite being a value theorist, Walras has an affinity with the monetary tradition, unlike most of his neoclassical successors. Nevertheless, Walras is not clear on the question of the nature of the money supply. This is the weakness of his model, which may well be open to Cartelier's criticism.
Keywords: division of labor; money; price; value; division du travail; monnaie; prix; valeur (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-his, nep-hpe and nep-mac
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-04254549v2
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Published in Interventions Economiques : Papers in Political Economy, 2023, 69, ⟨10.4000/interventionseconomiques.22871⟩
Downloads: (external link)
https://hal.science/hal-04254549v2/document (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04254549
DOI: 10.4000/interventionseconomiques.22871
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().