Does doctrinal paradox matter? an empirical inquiry on the french constitutional court

Quelle importance empirique pour le paradoxe doctrinal ? Une enquête sur la jurisprudence du Conseil constitutionnel français

Philippe Mongin and Samuel Ferey ()
Additional contact information
Samuel Ferey: BETA - Bureau d'Économie Théorique et Appliquée - AgroParisTech - UNISTRA - Université de Strasbourg - Université de Haute-Alsace (UHA) - Université de Haute-Alsace (UHA) Mulhouse - Colmar - UL - Université de Lorraine - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: Legal theory has often compared the functioning of collective courts with that of a single judge court. With the doctrinal paradox, Kornhauser et Sager [1993] have pointed an unexpected difficulty of the workings of the former: in some cases of collective deliberation, two very natural methods of collective decision, some times called issue based voting and outcome based voting, here labelled as the reason based and the conclusion based method, clash with each other. American commentators have investigated the record of the US Supreme Court with a view of finding whether this paradox was a mere theoretical possibility or arose in actual fact; this latter conclusion has prevailed. The present article confirms it after reviewing the record of the French Constitutional Council (Conseil constitutionnel), which shares some features of a supreme court. Besides making this empirical contribution, the paper takes up the comparison of the two methods and suggests a conciliation of the two methods that is partly based on observing how the Council operates in practice.

Keywords: Doctrinal paradox; Issue based and outcome voting; Reason based method; Conclusion based method; US Supreme Court; French Constitutional Council (Conseil constitutionnel); Kornhauser and Sager; Paradoxe doctrinal; Méthode des raisons; Méthode des conclusions; Cour suprême des États-Unis; Conseil constitutionnel français; Kornhauser et Sager (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023-01-11
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Published in Revue Economique, 2023, 73 (6), pp.1093-1118. ⟨10.3917/reco.736.1093⟩

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04264314

DOI: 10.3917/reco.736.1093

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().