Effectively communicating the removal of fossil energy subsidies: Evidence from Latin America

Yan Vieites, Bernardo Andretti, Mariana Weiss, Jorge Jacob and Michelle Hallack
Additional contact information
Yan Vieites: Brazilian School of Public and Business Administration [Rio de Janeiro]
Bernardo Andretti: Brazilian School of Public and Business Administration [Rio de Janeiro]
Mariana Weiss: Inter-American Development Bank - Inter-American Development Bank
Jorge Jacob: LEM - Lille économie management - UMR 9221 - UA - Université d'Artois - UCL - Université catholique de Lille - Université de Lille - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
Michelle Hallack: Inter-American Development Bank - Inter-American Development Bank

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: Fossil energy subsidies create a series of distortions that often have negative environmental and social consequences. Yet, since subsidies confer salient and tangible benefits in the form of cheaper prices, citizens are very resistant to reforms. This research investigates how to best communicate the removal of fossil subsidies using a highly powered, pre-registered study with 5,498 participants across 11 countries in Latin America. We assessed baseline knowledge and views about subsidies and randomly assigned participants to one of eight experimental conditions varying in both the aspects emphasized (e.g., environment, distributive justice, prospective fiscal benefits) and the form of providing the message (i.e., complete or summarized information). Our results show that citizens (a) display a generalized lack of knowledge about the existence of energy subsidies, (b) are very unwilling to remove these subsidies once they know of their existence, and (c) would like subsidies to actually increase rather than decrease. Despite these results, our experiment revealed that communication strategies can be tailored to increase the acceptance of energy reforms. Specifically, emphasizing the negative consequences of subsidies (e.g., overconsumption of natural resources and unfair allocation of resources to the wealthy) is more effective than highlighting the potential benefits to be obtained via their removal (e.g., higher investment in healthcare, education, public safety, or welfare programs). Further, providing complete information is more effective than offering summarized pieces of information. These findings provide guidance on how to effectively communicate energy reforms.

Date: 2023-07
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Published in Global Environmental Change, 2023, 81, pp.102690. ⟨10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2023.102690⟩

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04284883

DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2023.102690

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().