Social network and community level influences on contraceptive use: evidence from rural Poland

Heidi Colleran () and Ruth Mace
Additional contact information
Heidi Colleran: IAST - Institute for Advanced Study in Toulouse
Ruth Mace: UCL - University College of London [London]

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: The diffusion of ‘modern' contraceptives—as a proxy for the spread of low-fertility norms—has long interested researchers wishing to understand global fertility decline. A fundamental question is how local cultural norms and other people's behaviour influence the probability of contraceptive use, independent of women's socioeconomic and life-history characteristics. However, few studies have combined data at individual, social network and community levels to simultaneously capture multiple levels of influence. Fewer still have tested if the same predictors matter for different contraceptive types. Here, we use new data from 22 high-fertility communities in Poland to compare predictors of the use of (i) any contraceptives—a proxy for the decision to control fertility—with those of (ii) ‘artificial' contraceptives—a subset of more culturally taboo methods. We find that the contraceptive behaviour of friends and family is more influential than are women's own characteristics and that community level characteristics additionally influence contraceptive use. Highly educated neighbours accelerate women's contraceptive use overall, but not their artificial method use. Highly religious neighbours slow women's artificial method use, but not their contraceptive use overall. Our results highlight different dimensions of sociocultural influence on contraceptive diffusion and suggest that these may be more influential than are individual characteristics. A comparative multilevel framework is needed to understand these dynamics.

Date: 2015-05-22
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-04313952
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Published in Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 2015, vol. 282 (n° 1807), ⟨10.1098/rspb.2015.0398⟩

Downloads: (external link)
https://hal.science/hal-04313952/document (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04313952

DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2015.0398

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().