EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Testing four nudges in socially responsible investments: Default winner by inertia

Luc Meunier (luc.meunier@essca.fr) and Sophie Richit (sophie.richit@iae-aix.com)
Additional contact information
Luc Meunier: ESSCA Research Lab - ESSCA - ESSCA – École supérieure des sciences commerciales d'Angers = ESSCA Business School
Sophie Richit: CERGAM - Centre d'Études et de Recherche en Gestion d'Aix-Marseille - AMU - Aix Marseille Université - UTLN - Université de Toulon

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: Socially responsible investments (SRI) suffer from a lack of investments from individual investors, despite their positive attitudes toward SRI. This attitude–behavior gap is a serious issue, as SRI is often perceived as a way to promote sustainable development. We investigate nudges, especially the default option, as a way to encourage SRI. In a pre‐registered study conducted in October 2021 with 1050 US investors, we pit four nudges against one another to encourage individual investors to invest in SRI. All nudges significantly increased investment in SRI compared with the control group. Making SRI the default option with frictions to opt‐out is the most efficient intervention. This is closely followed by a default option without friction to opt out and option partitioning, which are not significantly different from each other. Precommitment, although statistically significant, has a modest effect on investment in SRI and is inferior to the other nudges. Overall, the two types of default as well as option partitioning are significant and impactful solutions for increasing investment in SRI.

Keywords: ESG; individual investors' behavior; nudges; socially responsible investments; sustainable development (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023-09-26
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://amu.hal.science/hal-04325247v1
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Published in Business ethics, the environment & responsibility, 2023, ⟨10.1111/beer.12612⟩

Downloads: (external link)
https://amu.hal.science/hal-04325247v1/document (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04325247

DOI: 10.1111/beer.12612

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD (hal@ccsd.cnrs.fr).

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04325247