Homophily versus monitoring: Do all female board directors drive the gender assignment of audit partners?

Mehdi Nekhili (), Fahim Javed, Haithem Nagati and Riadh Manita
Additional contact information
Mehdi Nekhili: ARGUMans - Laboratoire de recherche en gestion Le Mans Université - UM - Le Mans Université
Fahim Javed: CUI - COMSATS University Islamabad
Haithem Nagati: EM - EMLyon Business School
Riadh Manita: NEOMA - Neoma Business School

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: By examining the extent to which the proportion of female board directors affects the gender assignment of engagement partners, this paper contributes to the existing literature in several ways. First, we investigate the French mandatory joint audit setting, giving rise to a set of concerns with regard to the auditor pair composition. Second, we consider female directors according to their positions on the board in order to determine which of the homophily and monitoring arguments plays the greater part in the auditor selection process. Third, we address the moderating effect of the gender quota law on the link between female directorship and the choice of audit engagement partners. Using appropriate estimation methods, we find that female board members appointed to key monitoring positions (female independent directors and female audit committee members) choose gender-diverse engagement partners. However, counter to the gender similarity (homophily) argument, we find that female inside directors are negatively associated with the selection of gender-diverse engagement partners. The association between gender-diverse boards and gender-diverse audit partners is found to be more pronounced in the period following the enactment of the gender quota law, thereby providing some practical and policy implications with regard to capitalising on the benefits of gender diversity. Supplementary analyses support the preponderance of the monitoring argument over the homophily argument in the auditor selection process.

Keywords: Board gender diversity; Audit partner selection; Homophily; Monitoring (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023-01-01
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Published in Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 2023, 42 (1), pp.107053. ⟨10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2022.107053⟩

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04325648

DOI: 10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2022.107053

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().