The paradox of supplier development in technology-based luxury supply chains

Paolo Barbieri, Brice Dattee () and Santosh Mahapatra
Additional contact information
Paolo Barbieri: UNIBO - Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna = University of Bologna
Brice Dattee: EM - EMLyon Business School
Santosh Mahapatra: Clarkson University

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: Purpose This paper aims to examine how collaborative supplier development (SD) activities, supplier capabilities and buyer–supplier relationship interrelate in technology-based, luxury product business contexts characterized by small volumes, difficult targets and resource constraints relative to those targets. Design/methodology/approach Using inductive case research method, the authors investigate multiple embedded cases involving six dyadic buyer–supplier relationships of two luxury product manufacturers in the motorcycle and automotive industries. Each dyad represents an important sub-system for which the buying firm committed significant SD efforts to help the supplier successfully achieve difficult targets. Findings The analysis reveals how paradoxical tensions might emerge as the firms engage in successful SD activities, which could lead to decreasing relationship commitment ultimately resulting in the termination of the relationship. The authors utilize the "value co-creation and value capture" paradox framework to understand the SD and relationship dynamic and characterize it as developing-leveraging paradox to explain its dualities, i.e. commitment-based SD efforts (increasing value co-creation), and unilateral leveraging of the newly acquired capabilities (increasing value capture) by both the buyer and the supplier. Overemphasis on value capture by one of the exchange partners spurs a detrimental vicious cycle leading to the decline of the relationship. Research limitations/implications The study explains the paradoxical dynamics that may emerge in SD activities of innovative, technologically complex, luxury product firms. The findings contribute to the SD literature by highlighting how learnings from SD activities could contribute to the dark sides of buyer–supplier relationship. The technologically complex, luxury product contextual characteristics of the study may limit the generalizability of the study findings. Originality/value The study provides novel insights into the emergence and management of paradoxes in buyer–supplier relationships, in terms of virtuous and vicious dynamics of developing-leveraging.

Keywords: Paradoxes; Capabilities; Process (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023-11-27
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Published in International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 2023, 43 (11), 1723-1756 p. ⟨10.1108/IJOPM-11-2022-0703⟩

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04325768

DOI: 10.1108/IJOPM-11-2022-0703

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().