Optimal Financing Schemes for Unemployment Benefits: A Transatlantic Comparison
Julien Albertini and
Xavier Fairise ()
Additional contact information
Xavier Fairise: TEPP - Travail, Emploi et Politiques Publiques - UPEM - Université Paris-Est Marne-la-Vallée - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, EPEE - Centre d'Etudes des Politiques Economiques - UEVE - Université d'Évry-Val-d'Essonne
Post-Print from HAL
Abstract:
In this paper we study, in a DSGE model, the properties of an optimal financing scheme for unemployment benefits in a rigid, and in a flexible labor market. Taking inspiration from the US unemployment insurance system, we ask if firms should be taxed in proportion to their layoffs to finance the cost incurred by the unemployment-benefits fund. Moreover, we investigate how macroeconomic variables respond to aggregate shocks when labor market institutions differ. We study how a labor-market reform should be engaged to reduce the cost of fluctuations. The optimal policy is determined using DSGE techniques and the welfare gains are evaluated. We find that an optimal combination of unemployment benefits and layoff taxes is welfare-improving and can also improve labor market performances. In our two benchmark economies, the efficient layoff tax is close to the expected fiscal cost of an unemployed worker. Layoff taxes create a financial incentive for employers to stabilize their employment, reducing the worker flows and unemployment volatility considerably. The welfare gain induced by the reform is sizeabl
Keywords: DSGE Models; Ramsey Allocation; Search and Matching Frictions; Firing Tax; Experience Rating (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2009
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Published in Annals of Economics and Statistics, 2009, 95/96, pp.43-75. ⟨10.2307/27917403⟩
There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.
Related works:
Journal Article: An Optimal Financing Scheme for Unemployment Benefit: A Transatlantic Comparison (2009) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04329634
DOI: 10.2307/27917403
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().