The public policies of Smart Cities and Territories: Key Role of Governance in the Process of Public Value Creation

Politiques publiques de Villes et de Territoires Intelligents: le rôle clé de la gouvernance dans le processus de création de valeur publique

Pascal Frucquet (), David Carassus (), Didier Chabaud () and Pierre Marin ()
Additional contact information
Pascal Frucquet: LIREM - Laboratoire de Recherche en Management - UPPA - Université de Pau et des Pays de l'Adour
David Carassus: LIREM - Laboratoire de Recherche en Management - UPPA - Université de Pau et des Pays de l'Adour
Didier Chabaud: LAB IAE Paris - Sorbonne - IAE Paris - Sorbonne Business School
Pierre Marin: LIREM - Laboratoire de Recherche en Management - UPPA - Université de Pau et des Pays de l'Adour

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: The smart city concept is regularly associated with the ambition to create multi-dimensional value. Several authors have proposed to study it from the angle of the public value theory. However, few works have directly addressed the influence of governance practices on the public-value-creating process. We propose to bridge this gap by focusing on the French public policies of Smart Cities and Territories (SCT). After a literature review on the relationships between smart city, governance and public value we developed an analysis framework designed to apprehend the prevailing mode of governance for each SCT policy action and activity, whether proactive or open, as well as the various type(s) of public value created. The six "value-generating mechanisms" described by Harrison et al. (2012), efficiency, effectiveness, intrinsic enhancements, transparency, participation, and collaboration were set as mediatory variables. We then carried out an exploratory longitudinal qualitative study of two French local collectivities. Our outcomes allowed us to specify the role of governance in the public value-creating process in implementing SCT policies. We highlighted the contribution of proactive governance to creating the first five types of public value identified by Harrison et al. (2012): economic, political, social, strategic and quality-of-life. Open governance also drives these types of public value, especially the last two: ideological and stewardship. Yet, its implementation remains limited mainly due to technical and organizational factors, as well as to pressures exerted on resources which make it difficult to jointly handle the twofold dynamic of proactiveness and openness. We therefore identified a risk of not fulfilling the promise linked with the smart city concept to renew the relationship between public collectivities and their legitimacy and support environment, and thus a risk of relying only on partial public- value-creating dynamics.

Keywords: Local governance; Public value; Smart city; Smart territory; Ville Intelligente; Territoire Intelligent; Gouvernance locale; Valeur publique; Smart City (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023-11-01
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://univ-pau.hal.science/hal-04344052v1
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Published in Gestion et management public, 2023, 11 (4/4), pp.9-33. ⟨10.3917/gmp.114.0009⟩

Downloads: (external link)
https://univ-pau.hal.science/hal-04344052v1/document (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04344052

DOI: 10.3917/gmp.114.0009

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().