Self-Protection and Self-Insurance with Multiplicative Foreground and Background Risks

Christoph Heinzel ()
Additional contact information
Christoph Heinzel: SMART - Structures et Marché Agricoles, Ressources et Territoires - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement - Institut Agro Rennes Angers - Institut Agro - Institut national d'enseignement supérieur pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: Few work has analyzed self-protection and self-insurance in relation to multiplicative risks. Occasional treatments highlight differences to additive risk. This paper studies the prevalence, sources, and implications of such differences along various modeling features. Preference conditions differ as soon as mitigation effort or background risk are multiplicative to the foreground risk component in the utility argument. Only models with mitigation cost in utility terms and no background risk show no structural difference. In a numerical example for monetary cost, the same decision maker, who raises loss-risk mitigation with additive background risk, may reduce mitigation with background risk whenever multiplicative risk is present, in the foreground or background.

Keywords: Self-protection; Self-insurance; Multiplicative risk; Background risk (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022-12-12
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Published in CEAR/MRIC Behavioral Insurance Workshop 2022, MRIC, LMU Munich, Dec 2022, Munich, Germany

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04356667

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().