When sustainability backfires: A review on the unintended negative side-effects of product and service sustainability on consumer behavior
Diletta Acuti,
Marta Pizzetti () and
Sara Dolnicar
Additional contact information
Diletta Acuti: University of Portsmouth
Marta Pizzetti: EM - EMLyon Business School
Sara Dolnicar: UQ [All campuses : Brisbane, Dutton Park Gatton, Herston, St Lucia and other locations] - The University of Queensland
Post-Print from HAL
Abstract:
The existential need for more sustainable production and consumption has attracted substantial scholarly interest, which has focused on the positive outcomes of corporate sustainability. Negative side-effects have been largely neglected. This study contributes (1) by synthesizing past research into such negative side-effects from a diverse set of business disciplines; (2) by conceptualizing—for the first time—unintended negative side-effects of product and service sustainability; and (3) by developing a research agenda guiding researchers in addressing the most important knowledge gaps. The synthesis of 94 articles identifies three main cognitive mechanisms (information elaboration, product perception bias, and self-perception) and several emotionally aversive states (anxiety, shame, guilt, regret, distress, reduced enjoyment, frustration, discomfort, stress, and embarrassment) that are responsible for unintended negative side-effects resulting from product and service sustainability. Immediate managerial implications from this study include the critical importance of simple corporate sustainable communication that does not require consumers to dedicate substantial cognitive resources. Important future research directions include the investigation of the effects of green hushing and the development and testing of practical ways to help companies to avoid the sustainability liability trap, which leads to reduced demand because of sustainable features of products or services.
Keywords: Information complexity; Systematic review; Negative effect; Product perception; Self‐perception; Sustainability; Sustainable consumption (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022-10-01
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-env
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-04381310v1
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)
Published in Psychology and Marketing, 2022, 39 (10), 1933-1945 p. ⟨10.1002/mar.21709⟩
Downloads: (external link)
https://hal.science/hal-04381310v1/document (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04381310
DOI: 10.1002/mar.21709
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().