A new Form for the Evaluation of Scientific Articles under Peer Review

Un nouveau format pour l’évaluation des articles de recherche dans le processus d’examen par les pairs

Omar Sabaj Meruane (), Carlos González-Vergara (), Germán Varas Espinoza () and Alvaro Pina-Stranger ()
Additional contact information
Omar Sabaj Meruane: USERENA - Universidad de La Serena
Carlos González-Vergara: UC - Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile
Germán Varas Espinoza: USERENA - Universidad de La Serena
Alvaro Pina-Stranger: CREM - Centre de recherche en économie et management - UNICAEN - Université de Caen Normandie - NU - Normandie Université - UR - Université de Rennes - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: In this article a new form for the evaluation of scientific articles under peer review is presented. This proposal is based on some empirical observations with respect to the process through which scientific knowledge is built. The principles underlying this proposal are simplicity, agility and clarity in the feedback for authors. Some of the weaknesses of peer review could be addressed by applying this new procedure.

Keywords: Peer Review Process; Research Articles; Scientific Evaluation; Evaluation Forms; Scientific Production (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2015
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Published in Argos, 2015, 32 (62), pp.119-130

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04408864

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().