EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Making Southeast Asia: Crossing disciplines and bridging gaps or the blind men and the elephant

Marie-Sybille de Vienne ()
Additional contact information
Marie-Sybille de Vienne: Inalco - Institut National des Langues et Civilisations Orientales, CASE - Centre Asie du Sud-Est - EHESS - École des hautes études en sciences sociales - Inalco - Institut National des Langues et Civilisations Orientales - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: For scholars such as T. Pepinsky (2016), "The first principle of Southeast Asian Studies is the very artificiality of the concept of ‘Southeast Asia'"— a position which took form in 1945. Whether from an ethnic, religious, political or economic point of view, contemporary Southeast Asia appears a highly heterogeneous region indeed. More, the ‘artificiality' of Southeast Asia would be corroborated by the recent use (World War Two) of the term itself. However, this approach remains largely superficial, as previously illustrated (among others) by researchers such as Jean Przyluski, Denys Lombard or Anthony Reid. The term ‘Southeast Asia' appeared much earlier than the 20th century, in 1826 (in Andreas von Merian's Synglosse: oder Grundsätze der Sprachforschung), at the crossroad of two new disciplines, ethnology and linguistics. It implied that the region represented more than a mere extension of India beyond the gulf of Bengal (conversely to previous terminology) —a statement comforted by the use of the Persian term Zirbadad (the land below the wind') since the 17th century including in some Western cartography. The application of a few basic disciplines of social sciences (such as physical geography, history, archaeology, ethnology, literature) to the so-called ‘Southeast Asia' reveals the structuration as well as the delimitation and margins of a specific cultural area, thus preventing observers from acting as in the parable of the blind men and the elephant (Udana VI.4, Tittha Sutta), in which each of the blindmen grasped a part of the beast, ignoring thus the very existence of the elephant as a whole.

Keywords: Cartography; Southeast Asia; Terminology; Zirbadad (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022-11-08
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Published in Social Sciences and the World, Nov 2022, Pole Condorcet, France

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04425977

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04425977