The Role of Members' Lived Experience in the Evolution of Online Communities toward Online Communities of Practice

C. Lejealle, S. Castellano () and I. Khelladi
Additional contact information
C. Lejealle: ISC Paris - Institut Supérieur du Commerce de Paris
S. Castellano: Métis Lab EM Normandie - EM Normandie - École de Management de Normandie = EM Normandie Business School
I. Khelladi: PULV - Pôle Universitaire Léonard de Vinci

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: Purpose: This paper aims to explore how the lived experience of online communities' participants makes these communities evolve into online communities of practice (CoPs). Design/methodology/approach: A quantitative research design was used among backpackers. Data on backpackers' lived experience and interactions were collected. Findings: The results suggest a process of how online communities can become genuine online CoPs, thanks to participants' lived experience. Their activities (information search, perceived benefits and electronic word-of-mouth) result in knowledge sharing and creation. The findings also emphasize the roles of expertise and offline interactions as process moderators. Research limitations/implications: This study focuses on one specific practice to conduct the research (i.e. backpacking), which limits the generalizability of the results. Practical implications: This study offers several implications for companies and stakeholders. First, it describes how the lived experience transforms online communities into CoPs and helps stakeholders obtain knowledge for customers to innovate. Second, it analyzes the processes of participation, interaction and promotion to share and create knowledge for customers to increase stakeholders' competitiveness. Third, this study integrates members' offline interactions by highlighting their potential effects on tacit knowledge loss in online CoPs. Originality/value: The literature posits that online communities may evolve into online CoPs through a three-stage hierarchical path, but the underlying mechanisms and members' contributions to the process have been largely neglected in the literature. © 2021, Emerald Publishing Limited.

Keywords: eWoM; Expertise; Knowledge creation; Knowledge sharing; Online communities of practice; Perceived benefits (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Published in Journal of Knowledge Management, 2022, 26 (8), pp.1968-1984. ⟨10.1108/JKM-03-2021-0250⟩

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04452851

DOI: 10.1108/JKM-03-2021-0250

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().