Cross-border mobility responses to COVID-19 in Europe: new evidence from facebook data

Fredérić Docquier, Nicolas Golenvaux, Siegfried Nijssen, Pierre Schaus () and Felix Stips
Additional contact information
Fredérić Docquier: LISER - Luxembourg Institute of Socio-Economic Research
Nicolas Golenvaux: ICTEAM - Institute of Information and Communication Technologies, Electronics and Applied Mathematics - UCL - Université Catholique de Louvain = Catholic University of Louvain
Siegfried Nijssen: ICTEAM - Institute of Information and Communication Technologies, Electronics and Applied Mathematics - UCL - Université Catholique de Louvain = Catholic University of Louvain
Pierre Schaus: ICTEAM - Institute of Information and Communication Technologies, Electronics and Applied Mathematics - UCL - Université Catholique de Louvain = Catholic University of Louvain

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: Background Assessing the impact of government responses to Covid-19 is crucial to contain the pandemic and improve preparedness for future crises. We investigate here the impact of non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) and infection threats on the daily evolution of cross-border movements of people during the Covid-19 pandemic. We use a unique database on Facebook users' mobility, and rely on regression and machine learning models to identify the role of infection threats and containment policies. Permutation techniques allow us to compare the impact and predictive power of these two categories of variables. Results In contrast with studies on within-border mobility, our models point to a stronger importance of containment policies in explaining changes in cross-border traffic as compared with international travel bans and fears of being infected. The latter are proxied by the numbers of Covid-19 cases and deaths at destination. Although the ranking among coercive policies varies across modelling techniques, containment measures in the destination country (such as cancelling of events, restrictions on internal movements and public gatherings), and school closures in the origin country (influencing parental leaves) have the strongest impacts on cross-border movements. Conclusion While descriptive in nature, our findings have policy-relevant implications. Cross-border movements of people predominantly consist of labor commuting flows and business travels. These economic and essential flows are marginally influenced by the fear of infection and international travel bans. They are mostly governed by the stringency of internal containment policies and the ability to travel.

Date: 2022
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Published in Globalization and Health, 2022, 18, ⟨10.1186/s12992-022-00832-6⟩

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04465657

DOI: 10.1186/s12992-022-00832-6

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().