Discounting and Intergenerational Ethics

Stéphane Zuber and Marc Fleurbaey ()
Additional contact information
Marc Fleurbaey: PSE - Paris School of Economics - UP1 - Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne - ENS-PSL - École normale supérieure - Paris - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres - EHESS - École des hautes études en sciences sociales - ENPC - École nationale des ponts et chaussées - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement, PJSE - Paris Jourdan Sciences Economiques - UP1 - Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne - ENS-PSL - École normale supérieure - Paris - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres - INRA - Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique - EHESS - École des hautes études en sciences sociales - ENPC - École nationale des ponts et chaussées - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: The question of social discounting is central in intertemporal cost–benefit analysis that often shapes economists' recommendations regarding climate policy. The practice of discounting has been the object of heated debates among economists and philosophers, revolving around the issue of intergenerational ethics. In this chapter, the authors review the different arguments for and against specific values of social discounting. The authors show that there are actually two different ethical issues at stake: (1) the question of impartiality (or equal treatment of all generations) and (2) the question of priority to the worse off (aversion to inequality in resources, capabilities, or welfare). These questions have emerged in the utilitarian approach and can be neatly separated in that case. They also have very different consequences for climate policy. The authors then argue that the question of social discounting is not confined to the utilitarian framework as it more generally describes the social value of income (or capability or welfare) transfers to future generations. Lastly, the authors discuss the many limitations of social discounting as a tool for policy analysis.

Keywords: Discounting; Cost–benefit analysis; Social welfare; Prioritarianism; Utilitarianism; Inequality; Intergenerational justice (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-04467244v1
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Published in Stephen M. Gardiner. The Oxford Handbook of Intergenerational Ethics, Oxford University Press, 2019, 9780190881931. ⟨10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190881931.013.29⟩

Downloads: (external link)
https://hal.science/hal-04467244v1/document (application/pdf)

Related works:
Working Paper: Discounting and Intergenerational Ethics (2019)
Working Paper: Discounting and Intergenerational Ethics (2019)
Working Paper: Discounting and Intergenerational Ethics (2019)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04467244

DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190881931.013.29

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().