Corporate Social Responsibility Ratings and Financial Performance: An Analysis of Sub-Ratings in Europe

Bertrand Quéré (), Charles Richard Baker () and Genevieve Nouyrigat ()
Additional contact information
Genevieve Nouyrigat: CERAG - Centre d'études et de recherches appliquées à la gestion - UGA [2016-2019] - Université Grenoble Alpes [2016-2019]

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: In a previous research article , we studied the relationship between aggregate Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) ratings issued by the European rating agency, Vigeo Eiris, and accounting and stock market performance of a sample of European companies. Because the Vigeo Eiris CSR ratings are the sum of sub-rating scores assigned in the following six categories: Business Behavior (BB), Community Involvement (CIN), Corporate Governance (CG), Environment (ENV), Human Resources (HR), Human Rights (HRts), the purpose of the present article is to perform a detailed analysis of the Vigeo Eiris sub-ratings in order to confirm and extend the findings of our prior research. The overall objective of the present study is to deepen our investigation into the sub-ratings by measuring their impact on accounting and stock market performance by first using a "Prospective" approach in which the subsequent performance of the sample companies is predicted by their CSR sub-ratings. We then perform a "Retrospective" analysis which looks at the accounting and stock market performance of companies at time N-1 as compared with the CSR sub-ratings issued at time N (in other words, whether the performance predicts the ratings). With respect to the Prospective approach, a negative relationship is found between the CSR sub-ratings and the subsequent accounting and stock market performance of the sample companies. The results of the Retrospective analysis indicate that the sub-ratings are: (1) positively related to the market capitalization (i.e. size) of the sample companies; (2) negatively related to the difference between the risk of the companies and the average risk of their industry sectors; (3) negatively related to the difference between the market return of the sample companies and the average market return of the companies in the sector. The Retrospective approach confirms the three concepts developed in our previous work namely "political visibility", "priority" and "downgrading". In addition, certain sub-ratings, namely : environment (ENV), human resources (HR) and community involvement (CIN) dominate in the aggregate ratings, possibly due to their greater visibility and ease of measurement as compared with corporate governance (CG), human rights (HRts), and business behavior (BB), which are more difficult to measure and require a deeper understanding of the individual companies.

Keywords: CSR Rating Agency Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Corporate Financial Performance (CFP) Sub-rating; CSR Rating Agency; Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR); Corporate Financial Performance (CFP); Sub-rating (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-04533554v1
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Published in 2017, ⟨10.2139/ssrn.2977837⟩

Downloads: (external link)
https://hal.science/hal-04533554v1/document (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04533554

DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2977837

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().