The P-Value Debate and Implications for Management Research: The Significance of A Priori Probability
Liang Ding Jia,
Ze Min Lin,
Tao Wang (),
Meng Meng Bu and
Gang He
Additional contact information
Liang Ding Jia: NJU - Nanjing University
Ze Min Lin: University of Texas at Austin [Austin]
Tao Wang: EM - EMLyon Business School, Kyoto University
Meng Meng Bu: NJU - Nanjing University
Gang He: NJU - Nanjing University
Post-Print from HAL
Abstract:
This paper argues that the P-value debate is grounded in the confusion between statistical significance testing and statistical inferences. Using results of statistical significance testing to make statistical inferences can lead to the validation of many specious theories. While errors in statistical significance testing refer to the probability of false positives, errors in statistical inferences lie in the inverse probability of false positives. The relationship between two probabilities is highly affected by a priori probability. A higher a priori probability decreases the probability of errors when using results of statistical significance testing for statistical inferences. By contrast, a lower a priori probability increases the probability of statistical inference errors even if the probability of false positives is low. In order to improve the reliability of statistical inferences, this paper draws on management research and proposes to better establish a priori probability through a dual dialogue with practical and theoretical worlds. By doing so, this paper underlines the pervasiveness of underdetermination and sheds light on the interplay of the a priori and the empirical in management research.
Keywords: P-value; Inverse probability of false positives; Prior probability; Null hypothesis significance testing (NHST) (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024-03-01
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Published in Journal of Management Sciences in China, 2024, 27 (3), 1-14 p. ⟨10.19920/j.cnki.jmsc.2024.03.001⟩
There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04604341
DOI: 10.19920/j.cnki.jmsc.2024.03.001
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().