Building a conceptual framework of organizationally embedded tensions to enhance leadership for safety in high-risk and highly regulated organizations: A complexity leadership perspective

Natalia Jubault Krasnopevtseva, Yoann Guntzburger, Renata Kaminska and Catherine Thomas
Additional contact information
Natalia Jubault Krasnopevtseva: UBO - Université de Brest, LEGO - Laboratoire d'Economie et de Gestion de l'Ouest - UBS - Université de Bretagne Sud - UBO - Université de Brest - IMT - Institut Mines-Télécom [Paris] - IBSHS - Institut Brestois des Sciences de l'Homme et de la Société - UBO - Université de Brest - UBL - Université Bretagne Loire - IMT Atlantique - IMT Atlantique - IMT - Institut Mines-Télécom [Paris], Institut d'Administration des Entreprises (IAE) - Brest
Yoann Guntzburger: SKEMA Business School
Renata Kaminska: SKEMA Business School
Catherine Thomas: UniCA - Université Côte d'Azur

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: Despite substantial advancements in ensuring safety, high-risk and highly regulated organizations have not been immune to major life-threatening accidents. Growing evidence indicates that these accidents are not solely attributable to the limitations of technical barriers, but rather to the complex interactions among technical, human, and organizational factors. While both the literature and regulatory frameworks have acknowledged the role of leadership in addressing this complexity, traditional views of leadership for safety tend to focus on individual abilities to achieve safety objectives, overlooking its processual and organizationally embedded nature needed to deal with complexity. To address this gap, we draw upon Complexity Leadership Theory, which helps to embrace tensions stemming from complexity. Through a qualitative study based on an international and interdisciplinary workshop on leadership for safety in the nuclear sector, we develop a conceptual framework of organizationally embedded and dynamic tensions that leaders must engage with to enhance safety. Our results contribute to leadership for safety by explaining the embeddedness of this complex process and providing a more nuanced analysis of tensions at multiple levels and their interrelations. We also enrich the Complexity Leadership Theory by going beyond portraying different logics, mechanisms, or processes as irreconcilable polar extremes. By delving into dimensions of complexity related to leadership for safety, our framework provides new insights that can inform more nuanced safety policies and regulations in high-risk and highly regulated environments.

Date: 2024-09
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Published in Safety Science, 2024, 177, pp.106572. ⟨10.1016/j.ssci.2024.106572⟩

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04605566

DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2024.106572

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().