Dynamics of influence within the audit regulatory space: Role-playing and the rise of cynicism
Géraldine Hottegindre (),
Marie-Claire Loison () and
Loïc Belze
Additional contact information
Géraldine Hottegindre: EM - EMLyon Business School
Marie-Claire Loison: EM - EMLyon Business School
Loïc Belze: EM - EMLyon Business School
Post-Print from HAL
Abstract:
The European Commission (EC) conducted a major reform of statutory audit between 2010 and 2014, with the primary aim of improving competition in the market. The Big 4, who were targeted by this reform, were strongly opposed to it. The present study employs the typology of Oliver (1991) and the "presentation of self" theory developed by Goffman (1956) to identify the strategic responses employed, frontstage and backstage, by the regulator (EC) and the regulatees (Big 4) to influence the outcome of the reform. The results reveal that passive strategic responses tend to take place frontstage, while active and aggressive strategies generally take place backstage. This work also reveals the incursion of the neoliberal model into the European regulatory arena, and allows us to characterize the Big 4 as cynical actors defending a commercial logic.
Keywords: Audit; Strategic responses; Frontstage; Backstage; Big 4; European Commission (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024-12-01
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Published in Critical Perspectives On Accounting, 2024, 100, ⟨10.1016/j.cpa.2024.102743⟩
There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04665205
DOI: 10.1016/j.cpa.2024.102743
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().