The Ethical Embeddedness of the Economic Inequality Debate

Mikko Ketokivi (), Sebastien Fosse () and Peter Kawalek ()
Additional contact information
Mikko Ketokivi: IE Business School, IE University
Sebastien Fosse: Clermont School of Business/CleRMa
Peter Kawalek: Loughborough University

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: Abstract How do scholars formulate arguments about economic inequality? What is the role of empirical analysis? In what ways, if any, is the debate informed by ethical considerations? In this paper, we address these questions by evaluating one of the main arguments in Thomas Piketty's 2014 book Capital in the Twenty-First Century , along with its endorsements and rebuttals. Applying Stephen Toulmin's model of arguments to Piketty unearths a complex argument structure that must be understood for an evaluation to be possible. Of particular importance are the warrants that Piketty used to justify his conclusions from the empirical material. Our analysis revealed that the most influential rebuttals were targeted not at Piketty's empirical inferences but the way he used these inferences to justify his claims. We also found value judgments to be an essential part of the justification process, making Piketty's claims ultimately embedded in ethical considerations. We conclude that value judgments are intrinsic to scholarly arguments not only in economic inequality debates but also more broadly.

Keywords: Argument structure Economic inequality Ethical embeddedness; Argument structure; Economic inequality; Ethical embeddedness (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024-05-21
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-his, nep-hme and nep-hpe
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-04739363v1
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Published in Journal of Business Ethics, 2024, ⟨10.1007/s10551-024-05680-5⟩

Downloads: (external link)
https://hal.science/hal-04739363v1/document (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04739363

DOI: 10.1007/s10551-024-05680-5

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().