A matter of perspective: Technology contributions are assessed differently from manager and consumer perspectives
Amanda P. Yamim,
Robert P. Mai and
Moritz Joerling ()
Additional contact information
Amanda P. Yamim: EESC-GEM Grenoble Ecole de Management, USMB [Université de Savoie] [Université de Chambéry] - Université Savoie Mont Blanc
Robert P. Mai: EESC-GEM Grenoble Ecole de Management
Moritz Joerling: EM - EMLyon Business School
Post-Print from HAL
Abstract:
While the value of adopting technology (vs human) to develop products and provide services has been extensively explored from the consumer's standpoint, do managers fully comprehend how valuable technology is to consumers? This research reveals notable disparities between managers' and consumers' perceptions about the value of technology adoption. Seven studies ( N = 1,320) in different contexts show that people with a manager perspective perceive technology as a more valuable resource than those with a consumer perspective (studies 1A–D). These differences arise because managers place a higher value on the efficiency-related benefits of technology than consumers (study 2). To reduce the manager-consumer gap, highlighting technology-driven efficiency benefits for consumers can increase their technology valuation to the manager's level (study 3). However, informing managers about consumers' objections to technology failed to correct their overly optimistic assessments of technology contribution (study 4). Our findings attest to the importance of acknowledging the manager-customer gap when it comes to technological adoption.
Keywords: heuristics; human-made effect; manager-consumer differences; perspective taking; technology-related cognitions (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024-12
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Published in Recherche et Applications en Marketing (French Edition), 2024, 39 (4), 27-49 p. ⟨10.1177/20515707241283230⟩
There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04770992
DOI: 10.1177/20515707241283230
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().