Conform and Oppose through Numbers: Quantifying Hybrid Organizations at the International Cooperative Alliance

Benjamin Huybrechts, Dylan Nelson, Teresa Nelson, Noreen O'Shea and Frédéric Dufays
Additional contact information
Benjamin Huybrechts: LEM - Lille économie management - UMR 9221 - UA - Université d'Artois - UCL - Université catholique de Lille - Université de Lille - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
Dylan Nelson: UIUC - University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign [Urbana] - University of Illinois System
Teresa Nelson: Simmons University [Boston, USA]
Noreen O'Shea: ESCP Europe Business School [Berlin]
Frédéric Dufays: HEC, University of Liège

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: Collectives of hybrid organizations have emerged with the aim of promoting the plural goals and values embodied by their member organizations. Doing so, however, often requires simultaneous conformity and opposition to dominant institutional norms, such as those underlying mainstream market activity. We examine how hybrid collectives navigate this ‘conform‐and‐oppose' tension as they seek to promote their members' hybrid form through quantification – i.e., the use of numbers to label, count, and describe members. Analyzing the case of the International Cooperative Alliance, we identify four interrelated dimensions (valorization, validity, reactivity, and retroaction) through which a hybrid collective can harness quantification to manage differing commitments to market and social goals and values within and beyond the collective – a process we name formative quantification. Core to this process are two filtering mechanisms – validity searching and values queuing – through which a hybrid collective integrates stakeholder perceptions of truth (validity) and value (valorization) to navigate hybrid tensions. Our work extends theory on hybrid tension management to the inter‐organizational level, while shifting the view of organizational quantification from a tool of conformity‐enhancing evaluation towards a collective search for numbers that both conform to and oppose taken‐for‐granted norms.

Date: 2024-07-14
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Published in Journal of Management Studies, 2024, ⟨10.1111/joms.13123⟩

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04818482

DOI: 10.1111/joms.13123

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().